Daly v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Daly v. State

97 So. 167, 19 Ala. App. 322, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 178

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1923

Docket6 Div. 291.

StatusPublished

This text of 97 So. 167 (Daly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daly v. State, 97 So. 167, 19 Ala. App. 322, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 178 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

POSTER, J.

A conditional judgment was Tendered in the circuit court against the appellants, as sureties on the appearance bond of Charley Doan, upon the failure of the defendant to appear to answer an indictment perferred against him by a grand jury of Blount county.

We find.no final judgment in the record which would support an appeal under section 2837 of the Code of 1907, or any other statute. The only judgment in the record is one sustaining the state’s demurrers to a motion made by appellants (movants in the court below) to set aside a judgment nisi rendered against appellants as sureties on the appearance bond of Charley Doan. This court is therefore without jurisdiction to consider the rulings assigned as error, in the absence of such a judgment as will support an appeal. Section 2837, Code 1907; Gibbs v. Southern Express Co., 201 Ala. 506, 78 South. 860; 1 Michie’s Ala. Dig. par. 66, p. 303; 13 Michie’s Dig. par 78, p. 87.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POSTER, J.

A conditional judgment was Tendered in the circuit court against the appellants, as sureties on the appearance bond of Charley Doan, upon the failure of the defendant to appear to answer an indictment perferred against him by a grand jury of Blount county.

We find.no final judgment in the record which would support an appeal under section 2837 of the Code of 1907, or any other statute. The only judgment in the record is one sustaining the state’s demurrers to a motion made by appellants (movants in the court below) to set aside a judgment nisi rendered against appellants as sureties on the appearance bond of Charley Doan. This court is therefore without jurisdiction to consider the rulings assigned as error, in the absence of such a judgment as will support an appeal. Section 2837, Code 1907; Gibbs v. Southern Express Co., 201 Ala. 506, 78 South. 860; 1 Michie’s Ala. Dig. par. 66, p. 303; 13 Michie’s Dig. par 78, p. 87.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 167, 19 Ala. App. 322, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daly-v-state-alactapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack