Daly v. Paul Revere Variable Annuity Ins. Co.
This text of 502 A.2d 48 (Daly v. Paul Revere Variable Annuity Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ROSEMARY DALY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE PAUL REVERE VARIABLE ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges FURMAN and ASHBEY.
Thomas E. Durkin, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Dennis A. Durkin and Stephen D. Landfield, on the brief).
James M. Shaughnessy argued the cause for respondent (Haythe & Curley, attorneys; Mr. Shaughnessy and James J. Markowski, of counsel and on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Newman in his oral opinion reported at 199 N.J. Super. 584 (Law Div. 1984). We attach no materiality to the fact that decedent's application for disability insurance was submitted to Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, not to Paul Revere Variable Annuity Insurance Company which issued the life insurance policy with the decedent's application attached, upon which plaintiff's claim is brought.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
502 A.2d 48, 206 N.J. Super. 185, 1985 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daly-v-paul-revere-variable-annuity-ins-co-njsuperctappdiv-1985.