Daly v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Daly v. New York State Division of Human Rights

113 A.D.2d 975, 493 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52597

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 12, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 113 A.D.2d 975 (Daly v. New York State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daly v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 113 A.D.2d 975, 493 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Kane, J. Proceeding initiated in this court pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated December 13, 1984, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of unlawful discriminatory practices based on age and disability.

A review of the record supports the determination of the State Division of Human Rights that petitioner was not terminated as the result of a discriminatory practice but, rather, was terminated because of his substandard performance as a salesperson. Moreover, we are of the view that petitioner had an adequate opportunity to present his contentions and evidence, and that the Division’s investigation was sufficient (see, Matter of Campchero v General Elec. Broadcasting, 88 AD2d 747). The determination must, therefore, be confirmed.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kane, J. Proceeding initiated in this court pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated December 13, 1984, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of unlawful discriminatory practices based on age and disability.

A review of the record supports the determination of the State Division of Human Rights that petitioner was not terminated as the result of a discriminatory practice but, rather, was terminated because of his substandard performance as a salesperson. Moreover, we are of the view that petitioner had an adequate opportunity to present his contentions and evidence, and that the Division’s investigation was sufficient (see, Matter of Campchero v General Elec. Broadcasting, 88 AD2d 747). The determination must, therefore, be confirmed.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A.D.2d 975, 493 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daly-v-new-york-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack