Daly v. Eichkoff
129 A. 620, 98 N.J. Eq. 404, 13 Stock. 404, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 459
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bentle3’.
*410 For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Claek, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daly v. Eichkoff, 129 A. 620, 98 N.J. Eq. 404, 13 Stock. 404, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 459 (N.J. 1924).
129 A. 620 (Daly v. Eichkoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pressey v. Heath
114 A.2d 16 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Zaveski v. Kish
46 A.2d 665 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Matthews v. Craven
2 A.2d 176 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1938)
In Re Fulper
99 N.J. Eq. 293 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1926)