Daly v. DelPonte
610 A.2d 177, 223 Conn. 903, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 238
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 495, is granted, limited to the following questions:
“ 1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the defendant had the statutory authority to impose postreinstatement medical reporting requirements on the plaintiff?
“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the defendant’s imposition of postreinstatement medical reporting requirements did not violate the plaintiff’s constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the laws?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daly v. DelPonte, 610 A.2d 177, 223 Conn. 903, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 238 (Colo. 1992).
610 A.2d 177 (Daly v. DelPonte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daly v. DelPonte
624 A.2d 876 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)