Daly v. Commissioner

1 B.T.A. 993, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2713
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided April 13, 1925·No. Docket No. 563.·Published

Opinion

OPINION.

Marquette :

The only evidence offered by the taxpayer to prove the value of the property herein on March 1, 1913, was an assessment by the City of New York for the year 1913, wherein the property in question was assessed at $10,000. Standing alone, we do not think this is competent evidence to prove value and it is ordinarily excluded by the courts when offered for such purpose. Dorr v. Massachusetts Title Ins. Co., 238 Mass. 490; 131 N. E. 191. Even though we assume the March 1, 1913, value claimed by the taxpayer, no evidence has been offered to show the depreciated value at the time of sale in 1920. See Appeal of Even Realty Co., 1 B. T. A. 355. The record fails to show error in the proposed assessment and the determination of the Commissioner must be approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daly v. Commissioner, 1 B.T.A. 993, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2713 (bta 1925).

1 B.T.A. 993 (Daly v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorr v. Massachusetts Title Insurance
131 N.E. 191 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
Appeal of Daly
1 B.T.A. 993 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)