Daly v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 724 (Daly v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To set aside a decree of divorce.
Denied Nov. 7, 1894, with costs.
Relator filed a bill for divorce. Defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill, to which complainant answered. Defendant was granted a decree March 21, 1894. The cross-bill was verified, but the verification did not contain the averment negativing collusion. June 29, 1894, relator filed a petition asking that the decree be set aside, because (1) no replication to complainant's answer to the cross bill had been filed; (2) defendant's cross-bill was not properly verified; (3) the testimony was taken within four months after the filing of the cross-bill, and (4) the decree was entered within the same time.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 724, 102 McGrath 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daly-v-circuit-judge-mich-1894.