Daly v. Brady

Second Circuit

Daly v. Brady

75 F. 1022, 20 C.C.A. 680, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2089

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 27, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 75 F. 1022 (Daly v. Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daly v. Brady, 75 F. 1022, 20 C.C.A. 680, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2089 (2d Cir. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The supreme court had decided in this case that no appeal was ever taken from the judgment of this court. 16 -Sup. Ct. 961. The time has now passed within which an appeal can be taken. The judgment was duly entered in this court. To vacate it and direct the entry of a new judgment for the purpose of permitting an appeal would be merely an evasion of the statute which requires appeals 'to be brought within a prescribed time. We are satisfied that we are without power to grant any relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The supreme court had decided in this case that no appeal was ever taken from the judgment of this court. 16 -Sup. Ct. 961. The time has now passed within which an appeal can be taken. The judgment was duly entered in this court. To vacate it and direct the entry of a new judgment for the purpose of permitting an appeal would be merely an evasion of the statute which requires appeals 'to be brought within a prescribed time. We are satisfied that we are without power to grant any relief.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 F. 1022, 20 C.C.A. 680, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daly-v-brady-ca2-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack