Daly Brothers, Inc. v. La Croix

160 A. 869, 114 Conn. 738, 1932 Conn. LEXIS 98
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 12, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Section 10 of the Rules for Appellate Procedure provides that when .an assignment of error seeking a correction in the finding is not established this court may direct that the costs of printing the evidence in support of it shall not be taxed. The opinion in this case contained no such direction. It was therefore the duty of the clerk to tax the expense of printing the evidence to the prevailing party and an appeal from his action in so doing does not lie.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daly Brothers, Inc. v. La Croix, 160 A. 869, 114 Conn. 738, 1932 Conn. LEXIS 98 (Colo. 1932).

160 A. 869 (Daly Brothers, Inc. v. La Croix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beit v. Beit
65 A.2d 171 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1949)