Dalton v. Vanderkooi

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dalton v. Vanderkooi

214 S.E.2d 670, 134 Ga. App. 381, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2020

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 4, 1975·No. 50237·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

1. It is not error for the trial judge to grant a continuance prior to the date the case is set for trial. Code § 81-1419.

2. The awarding of reasonable attorney fees and expenses because of the defendant’s failure to comply with Code Ann. § 81A-130 (g) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 641; 1967, pp. 226, 233; 1972, pp. 510, 515) was not erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell, P. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Judge.

1. It is not error for the trial judge to grant a continuance prior to the date the case is set for trial. Code § 81-1419.

2. The awarding of reasonable attorney fees and expenses because of the defendant’s failure to comply with Code Ann. § 81A-130 (g) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 641; 1967, pp. 226, 233; 1972, pp. 510, 515) was not erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell, P. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Dalton v. Vanderkooi, 214 S.E.2d 670, 134 Ga. App. 381, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2020 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

214 S.E.2d 670 (Dalton v. Vanderkooi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.