Dalton v. Travelers Insurance

102 Ohio St. 3d 450
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 11, 2004
DocketNo. 2003-0270
StatusPublished

This text of 102 Ohio St. 3d 450 (Dalton v. Travelers Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dalton v. Travelers Insurance, 102 Ohio St. 3d 450 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

{¶ 1} IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions to clarify be, and hereby are, granted.

Allen Schulman & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Allen Schulman Jr.; John S. Coury, for cross-appellants. Tucker, Ellis & West, L.L.P., Irene C. Keyse-Walker, Mark F. McCarthy and Kristen L. Mayer, for cross-appellee Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois. Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Timothy J. Fitzgerald and D. John Travis, for cross-appellee Federal Insurance Co. Janik & Dorman, L.L.P., Steven G. Janik and Matthew J. Grimm, for crossappellee National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA. Law Offices of Robert B. Daane, L.L.C., and Robert B. Daane, for crossappellee Grange Mutual Casualty Insurance Co.

{¶ 2} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the second paragraph of our April 20, 2004 order is vacated.

{¶ 3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that cross-appellants’ motion for reconsideration filed November 17, 2003, is denied.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 Ohio St. 3d 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalton-v-travelers-insurance-ohio-2004.