Dalton v. Nelson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Dalton v. Nelson

163 So. 467, 26 Ala. App. 549, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 176

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 8, 1935

Docket6 Div. 816.

StatusPublished

This text of 163 So. 467 (Dalton v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dalton v. Nelson, 163 So. 467, 26 Ala. App. 549, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 176 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The brief in this case is no more than a restatement of the. assignments of error. There is an entire failure on the part of counsel to comply with Supreme Court Rules 10 and 12. This court is not disposed to a strict construction of these rules, but have in all cases construed them liberally in favor of litigants who show substantial compliance with their terms. But to ignore them completely cannot be permitted or condoned. Ogburn-Griffin Grocery Company v. Orient Ins. Co., 188 Ala. 218, 66 So. 434.

We may say, however, that we have examined the record and the assignments and find no error in the rulings of the court in any of them.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

The brief in this case is no more than a restatement of the. assignments of error. There is an entire failure on the part of counsel to comply with Supreme Court Rules 10 and 12. This court is not disposed to a strict construction of these rules, but have in all cases construed them liberally in favor of litigants who show substantial compliance with their terms. But to ignore them completely cannot be permitted or condoned. Ogburn-Griffin Grocery Company v. Orient Ins. Co., 188 Ala. 218, 66 So. 434.

We may say, however, that we have examined the record and the assignments and find no error in the rulings of the court in any of them.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 So. 467, 26 Ala. App. 549, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalton-v-nelson-alactapp-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack