Dalton v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Dalton v. Maass

749 P.2d 138, 89 Or. App. 332

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 3, 1988

Docket86-C-11348; CA A43256

StatusPublished

This text of 749 P.2d 138 (Dalton v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dalton v. Maass, 749 P.2d 138, 89 Or. App. 332 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this habeas corpus proceeding, the trial court granted the state a summary judgment. We affirmed. 88 Or App 187, 744 P2d 300 (1987). The inmate has petitioned for review, which we treat as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. The petition is granted, and the previous opinion is withdrawn. The summary judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded. Jorgenson v. Schiedler, 87 Or App 100, 741 P2d 528 (1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this habeas corpus proceeding, the trial court granted the state a summary judgment. We affirmed. 88 Or App 187, 744 P2d 300 (1987). The inmate has petitioned for review, which we treat as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. The petition is granted, and the previous opinion is withdrawn. The summary judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded. Jorgenson v. Schiedler, 87 Or App 100, 741 P2d 528 (1987).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

749 P.2d 138, 89 Or. App. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalton-v-maass-orctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack