Dalton v. Dritras

49 N.E.2d 991, 290 N.Y. 518, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1072
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 18, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 N.E.2d 991 (Dalton v. Dritras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dalton v. Dritras, 49 N.E.2d 991, 290 N.Y. 518, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1072 (N.Y. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this action to recover death benefits because of the death of her husband who was a member of the defendant union, plaintiff’s asserted right depends upon article XI of the Union’s by-laws. Only dependents of a member of the Union who dies in good standing are entitled to receive death benefits (art XI, § 1) and this right is subject to and expressly limited by rules, regulations, definitions and exceptions specified in the subsequent sections of article XI, including section 3 which provides: “ 3. A member in good standing within the meaning of this Article is one who for the year just prior to his death has fully paid all dues, assessments and fines of Local 302 falling due within said year, and who had not been in arrears more than two calendar months at a time vithin said year.” Thus the prescribed condition is not merely that there shall be no arrears when death occurs, but that there shall not have been arrears for more than two calendar months at a time within one year prior to death.

*520 It was conceded upon the trial that for the year immediately preceding his death, Edward Dalton (plaintiff’s deceased husband) had been in arrears more than two months at a time. The courts below erroneously held plaintiff entitled to recover because Dalton was not in arrears at the time of his death. We could not hold that acceptance of payment of arrears before death waives or removes the further condition imposed by section 3 of article XI except by striking it out. This we may not do.

The judgments should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, without costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Ripfey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dobranski v. Doe
267 A.D. 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 N.E.2d 991, 290 N.Y. 518, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalton-v-dritras-ny-1943.