Dalton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
WESLEY DALTON,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 6:19-cv-300-RBD-LHP
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant. ____________________________________
ORDER In this Social Security appeal, the Court reversed the Commissioner’s decision denying disability benefits. (Doc. 18.) Plaintiff’s counsel now moves to recover attorney’s fees from Plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. §406(b). (Doc. 25 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price recommends granting the Motion and allowing a recovery of $8,715.35. (Doc. 26 (“R&R”).) No objections were filed and the time for doing so has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 26) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. Plaintiff's counsel’s Motion (Doc. 25) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff's counsel is AUTHORIZED to charge and collect $8,715.35 from Plaintiff. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on April 20, 2023.
bi Mai a ROY B. DALTON JR: United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dalton v. Commissioner of Social Security (Dalton v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.