Dalton v. American Investment Company

501 A.2d 1238, 1985 Del. LEXIS 514
CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedDecember 30, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 501 A.2d 1238 (Dalton v. American Investment Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dalton v. American Investment Company, 501 A.2d 1238, 1985 Del. LEXIS 514 (Del. 1985).

Opinion

This appeal is from a decision of the Court of Chancery in favor of defendants in an action by certain preference stockholders seeking to enjoin the merger of American Investment Company (AIC) and Leucadia American Corp. (Leucadia American), a subsidiary of Leucadia, Inc. (Leuca-dia), and, after a request for preliminary injunction was denied, claiming money damages.

The essence of appellants’ claim is that the AIC Board of Directors, all of whom were common stockholders of AIC and a majority of whom represented the largest common stockholders of AIC, breached the fiduciary duties of AIC and the Board members, by conducting negotiations with Leucadia with the purpose and effect of maximizing the per share return to the common stockholders to the exclusion of the preference shareholders who were unfairly frozen in as shareholders in the surviving corporation.

The factual findings of the Chancellor are set forth in great detail in the Court’s reported opinion. Dalton v. American Investment Company, Del.Ch., 490 A.2d 574 (1985). The Chancellor’s findings clearly are supported by the record. We adopt those findings and conclusions drawn therefrom as if they were our own. The Chancellor’s excellent opinion is a model of thoroughness and clarity. To the extent the issues on appeal are issues of law, the issues are the same as were raised in the Court of Chancery and are controlled by settled Delaware law. To the extent the issues on appeal are matters of judicial discretion, there appears no abuse of that discretion. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Chancery, we AFFIRM.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MARINER LDC v. Stone Container Corp.
729 A.2d 267 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1998)
Warner Communications Inc. v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.
583 A.2d 962 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1989)
Warner Commun. v. CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES
583 A.2d 962 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
501 A.2d 1238, 1985 Del. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalton-v-american-investment-company-del-1985.