Dalton L. Lewis v. Michael T.W. Bell Tin T. Le, Doctor, and Nurse Rebbie

Fourth Circuit

Dalton L. Lewis v. Michael T.W. Bell Tin T. Le, Doctor, and Nurse Rebbie

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19100, 1995 WL 318444

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1995

Docket95-6214

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 61 (Dalton L. Lewis v. Michael T.W. Bell Tin T. Le, Doctor, and Nurse Rebbie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dalton L. Lewis v. Michael T.W. Bell Tin T. Le, Doctor, and Nurse Rebbie, 56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19100, 1995 WL 318444 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Dalton L. LEWIS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Michael T.W. BELL; Tin T. Le, Doctor, Defendants--Appellees,
and
Nurse Rebbie, Defendant.

No. 95-6214.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995
Decided: May 25, 1995

Dalton L. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. James Peeler Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and its order dismissing one defendant for lack of service under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(j), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Bell, No. CA-93-513-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. May 20 and Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Dalton L. LEWIS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Michael T.W. BELL; Tin T. Le, Doctor, Defendants--Appellees,
and
Nurse Rebbie, Defendant.

No. 95-6214.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995
Decided: May 25, 1995

Dalton L. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. James Peeler Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and its order dismissing one defendant for lack of service under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(j), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Bell, No. CA-93-513-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. May 20 and Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19100, 1995 WL 318444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalton-l-lewis-v-michael-tw-bell-tin-t-le-doctor-a-ca4-1995.