Dalton Fruit & Produce Co. v. Connally

103 S.E. 800, 25 Ga. App. 422, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 851
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 13, 1920·No. 11497·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The only exception to any ruling in this case is thus stated in the bill of exceptions: “ To the refusal of the court to allow the plaintiff to file traverses to the answers filed by the defendants in said case the plaintiff in error then and there excepted, and now excepts and assigns the same as error, because the same is contrary to law.” This is not an exception to a final judgment. “ A bill of exceptions .in which there is no exception to the final judgment does not confer jurisdiction upon this court, and the writ of error must be dismissed.” Simmons v. Peagler, 7 Ga. App. 252 (66 S. E. 629), and cit. See also Lyndon v. Ga. Ry. & Electric Co., 129 Ga. 354 (3) (58 S. E. 1047); Montgomery v. Reynolds, 124 Ga. 1053 (53 S. E. 512), and cit.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dalton Fruit & Produce Co. v. Connally, 103 S.E. 800, 25 Ga. App. 422, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 851 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 800 (Dalton Fruit & Produce Co. v. Connally) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montgomery v. Reynolds
53 S.E. 512 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.
58 S.E. 1047 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Simmons v. Peagler
66 S.E. 629 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)