Dalton City Co. v. Hawes & Willoughby

37 Ga. 115
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 Ga. 115 (Dalton City Co. v. Hawes & Willoughby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dalton City Co. v. Hawes & Willoughby, 37 Ga. 115 (Ga. 1867).

Opinion

Habéis, J.

- The plaintiff in error was sued as a copartner with E. K. Ford, under thqname of E. E. Ford & Co., by which firm name a draft at six months for $815.87, drawn by Hawes & Willoughby, was accepted.

The plaintiff in error denied the partnership. To establish below the partnership, the plaintiff there put in evidence an instrument in writing purporting to be a lease by the Dalton City Company to E.. E. Ford, of its steam mill and machinery, and whereby the defendant, as rent for the same, reserved one-half of net profits, etc., and also produced an exemplification of the case of the Dalton Manufacturing Company vs. E. E. Ford & Co., decided by this Court at Atlanta, in March, 1862, in which suit said instrument in writing, called a lease, seems to have been carefully analyzed, and was adjudged to constitute articles of partnership between the plaintiff in error and said E. E. Ford. With the interpretation thus made of said “lease,” we are content to abide.,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Callaway v. Waxelbaum Co.
57 S.E. 762 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Brandon & Dreyer v. Conner
63 L.R.A. 260 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Ga. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalton-city-co-v-hawes-willoughby-ga-1867.