Dalsheim Accessories Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dalsheim Accessories Corp. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 347

United States Customs Court·Decided February 23, 1956·No. No. 59727; protest 133264-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the beads represented by items 10023, 10024, and 10025 consist of beads in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones, the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained as to said items. Items 11/0 and 18/0, stipulated to consist of beads, loosely strung, were held dutiable at 35 percent under said paragraph as beads, not specially provided for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the beads represented by items 10023, 10024, and 10025 consist of beads in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones, the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained as to said items. Items 11/0 and 18/0, stipulated to consist of beads, loosely strung, were held dutiable at 35 percent under said paragraph as beads, not specially provided for.

Dalsheim Accessories Corp. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 347 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 347 (Dalsheim Accessories Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.