Dalrymple v. Buckingham

Mississippi Supreme Court

Dalrymple v. Buckingham

23 Miss. 597

DecidedJanuary 15, 1852

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Miss. 597 (Dalrymple v. Buckingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dalrymple v. Buckingham, 23 Miss. 597 (Mich. 1852).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fisher

delivered the opinion of the court.

The bill of exceptions in this case professes to embody all the testimony offered by either party. It contains only the testimony of two witnesses. This under the bill of exceptions appears to have been all the evidence. From this it appears that the note sued on was not read in evidence to the jury. The verdict was therefore incorrect.

Judgment for this error reversed; new trial granted; defendant in error to pay costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Fisher

delivered the opinion of the court.

The bill of exceptions in this case professes to embody all the testimony offered by either party. It contains only the testimony of two witnesses. This under the bill of exceptions appears to have been all the evidence. From this it appears that the note sued on was not read in evidence to the jury. The verdict was therefore incorrect.

Judgment for this error reversed; new trial granted; defendant in error to pay costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Miss. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalrymple-v-buckingham-miss-1852.