DALRYMPLE GRAVEL & CONTRACTING CO., INC. v. State

225 N.E.2d 210, 19 N.Y.2d 644, 278 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1775
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 1967·No. Claim 38594·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. In Buffalo Elec. Co. v. State of New York (14 N Y 2d 453 [1964]) and Brandt Corp. v. City of New York (14 N Y 2d 217, 220 [1964]) we held that when a claimant accepted final payment from the State or city pursuant to its contract “it could not thereafter assert claims for additional sums which it had attempted to reserve ” upon acceptance. This in no way conflicts with our holding in this ease where the only issue is whether any valid acceptance was made. We conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the affirmed finding below that no acceptance was ever effected.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Soileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DALRYMPLE GRAVEL & CONTRACTING CO., INC. v. State, 225 N.E.2d 210, 19 N.Y.2d 644, 278 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1775 (N.Y. 1967).

225 N.E.2d 210 (DALRYMPLE GRAVEL & CONTRACTING CO., INC. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silverite Construction Co. v. Facilities Development Corp.
172 A.D.2d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Cayuga Construction Corp. v. City of New York
86 Misc. 474 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
C. K. Rehner, Inc. v. Board of Education
49 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)