D'Aloia v. Civil Service Commission

125 A. 926, 2 N.J. Misc. 620, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 127
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 25, 1924·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A rule was granted in this case why a peremptory or alternative writ of mandamus should not issue out of the court, directed to- the civil service commission of New Jersey. The point involved is the true construction of a section of the Civil Service act (Pamph. L. 1908, p. 235. ¶ 26), and a supplement thereto (Pamph. L. 1918, p. 158), a salary regulation which is known as the classification and standardization plan. This statute is of state-wide application and of general public interest. We think the alternative writ should issue, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Aloia v. Civil Service Commission, 125 A. 926, 2 N.J. Misc. 620, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 127 (N.J. 1924).

125 A. 926 (D'Aloia v. Civil Service Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co. v. H. Rouw Co.
271 S.W.2d 666 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)
La Sasso v. MacLeod
56 A.2d 430 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1948)
McTamney v. McTamney
46 A.2d 444 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Powell v. Meyer
43 A.2d 175 (Essex County Court, 1945)
Crail v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
13 F.2d 459 (Eighth Circuit, 1926)