D'Aloia v. City of Summit

99 A. 189, 89 N.J.L. 711, 4 Gummere 711, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 380
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 20, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the payment was voluntary. The present plaintiff had the option to pay or appeal. He chose to pay. He cannot recover back the money. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief • Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Mintuen, Kalisoh, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 10.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Aloia v. City of Summit, 99 A. 189, 89 N.J.L. 711, 4 Gummere 711, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 380 (N.J. 1916).

99 A. 189 (D'Aloia v. City of Summit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Heath
15 A.2d 92 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1940)