Dalmazzo v. Drysdale

California Supreme Court

Dalmazzo v. Drysdale

21 P. 553, 3 Cal. Unrep. 84

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1889

DocketNo. 12,956

StatusPublished

This text of 21 P. 553 (Dalmazzo v. Drysdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dalmazzo v. Drysdale, 21 P. 553, 3 Cal. Unrep. 84 (Cal. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

BEATTY, C. J.

This case was submitted without oral argument on briefs to be filed, the appellants to file the first brief. The time allowed appellants to file their brief has elapsed, no brief has been filed by appellants, no extension of time has been asked, and respondent moves for affirmance of the judgment and order appealed from. Where appellant fails to point out any error in the judgment or order appealed from, the court will not look into the record for the purpose of discovering error. Judgment and order affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEATTY, C. J.

This case was submitted without oral argument on briefs to be filed, the appellants to file the first brief. The time allowed appellants to file their brief has elapsed, no brief has been filed by appellants, no extension of time has been asked, and respondent moves for affirmance of the judgment and order appealed from. Where appellant fails to point out any error in the judgment or order appealed from, the court will not look into the record for the purpose of discovering error. Judgment and order affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 P. 553, 3 Cal. Unrep. 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalmazzo-v-drysdale-cal-1889.