Dalmas v. Philipsburg & Susquehanna Valley Railroad
98 A. 796, 254 Pa. 9, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 675
Opinion
This decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the court below sustaining the demurrer to plaintiff’s bill.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dalmas v. Philipsburg & Susquehanna Valley Railroad, 98 A. 796, 254 Pa. 9, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 675 (Pa. 1916).
98 A. 796 (Dalmas v. Philipsburg & Susquehanna Valley Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mezza v. Beiletti Et Ux.
53 A.2d 835 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Nice Ball Bearing Co. v. Mortgage Building & Loan Ass'n
166 A. 239 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
D. N. Corporation v. Roudabush
164 A. 60 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 248 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1931)
Kuyalowicz v. Schuylkill Gas & Electric Co.
1 Pa. D. & C. 159 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1921)
Pennsylvania Utilities Co. v. Public Service Commission
69 Pa. Super. 612 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)