Dalman v. Perigo

62 So. 2d 36, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1874
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1952
StatusPublished

This text of 62 So. 2d 36 (Dalman v. Perigo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dalman v. Perigo, 62 So. 2d 36, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1874 (Fla. 1952).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined. The point for determination is whether or not the evidence in support of negligence, gross negligence and wilful or wanton misconduct and proximate cause should have been submitted to the jury.

Our examination reveals no reversible error so the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Cormier v. Williams, 148 Fla. 201, 4 So.2d 525.

Affirmed.

SEBRING, C. J., and TERRELL and MATHEWS, JJ., and WHITE, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cormier v. Williams
4 So. 2d 525 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 So. 2d 36, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalman-v-perigo-fla-1952.