Dallmeyer v. Dallmeyer
16 A. 72, 2 Monag. 155, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 826
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 5, 1888
DocketNo. 139
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 16 A. 72 (Dallmeyer v. Dallmeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dallmeyer v. Dallmeyer, 16 A. 72, 2 Monag. 155, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 826 (Pa. 1888).
Opinion
The first assignment of error cannot be sustained. No exception was taken to the evidence complained of when it was admitted, and the motion to strike out was properly disregarded. Oswald v. Kennedy, 48 Pa. 9.
The second assignment is answered by saying that it would have been a grave error not to have submitted the case to the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Yoder v. Reynolds
72 P. 417 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 A. 72, 2 Monag. 155, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dallmeyer-v-dallmeyer-pa-1888.