Dallmeyer v. Dallmeyer

16 A. 72, 2 Monag. 155, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 826
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 5, 1888·No. No. 139·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The first assignment of error cannot be sustained. No exception was taken to the evidence complained of when it was admitted, and the motion to strike out was properly disregarded. Oswald v. Kennedy, 48 Pa. 9.

The second assignment is answered by saying that it would have been a grave error not to have submitted the case to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dallmeyer v. Dallmeyer, 16 A. 72, 2 Monag. 155, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 826 (Pa. 1888).

16 A. 72 (Dallmeyer v. Dallmeyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yoder v. Reynolds
72 P. 417 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)