Dallinger v. Rapallo

D. Massachusetts

Dallinger v. Rapallo

15 F. 434, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2035

CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts

DecidedMarch 2, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 F. 434 (Dallinger v. Rapallo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dallinger v. Rapallo, 15 F. 434, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2035 (D. Mass. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Gray, Justice.

Since the decision in October last, sustaining the defendant’s demurrer, the plaintiff, by leave of the court, has amended his declaration, so as to show that, among other bequests made by the will under which the defendant was appointed and acted as executor, the testator gave to each of three persons, who at the time of the probate and ever since were inhabitants of Cambridge, the income for life of a sum of $20,000, to be set apart and invested by the executor, and the principal, after the death of the beneficiary for life, to be paid to other persons who are not shown to be inhabitants of Massachusetts; and that the personal property of the testator coming to the hands of the executor was sufficient to provide for these three bequests. The case has now been argued upon a demurrer to the amended declaration.

We are of opinion that the facts thus alleged and admitted do not vary the result; that neither the seventh clause of the General Stat[435]*435utos, c. 11, § 12, nor the statute of 1878, c. 189, § 2, authorizes the assessment, to an executor residing out of the state, of an annual tax upon, or by reason of, personal property which is part of the estate of his testator, and is held by him in trust to pay the income for life to inhabitants of the state, hut is not shown to be itself within the state; and that the whole object and effect of the later statute are to amend the earlier one in the single point, that, after the expiration of throe years from the appointment of the executor, the property, whether distributed or not, should he assessed according to the provisions of the fifth clause of the General Statutes, c. 11, § 12; and by that clause property held by an executor residing out of the state, in trust to pay the income to persons within the state, is taxable to the latter only.

Demurrer sustained, and judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray, Justice.

Since the decision in October last, sustaining the defendant’s demurrer, the plaintiff, by leave of the court, has amended his declaration, so as to show that, among other bequests made by the will under which the defendant was appointed and acted as executor, the testator gave to each of three persons, who at the time of the probate and ever since were inhabitants of Cambridge, the income for life of a sum of $20,000, to be set apart and invested by the executor, and the principal, after the death of the beneficiary for life, to be paid to other persons who are not shown to be inhabitants of Massachusetts; and that the personal property of the testator coming to the hands of the executor was sufficient to provide for these three bequests. The case has now been argued upon a demurrer to the amended declaration.

We are of opinion that the facts thus alleged and admitted do not vary the result; that neither the seventh clause of the General Stat[435]*435utos, c. 11, § 12, nor the statute of 1878, c. 189, § 2, authorizes the assessment, to an executor residing out of the state, of an annual tax upon, or by reason of, personal property which is part of the estate of his testator, and is held by him in trust to pay the income for life to inhabitants of the state, hut is not shown to be itself within the state; and that the whole object and effect of the later statute are to amend the earlier one in the single point, that, after the expiration of throe years from the appointment of the executor, the property, whether distributed or not, should he assessed according to the provisions of the fifth clause of the General Statutes, c. 11, § 12; and by that clause property held by an executor residing out of the state, in trust to pay the income to persons within the state, is taxable to the latter only.

Demurrer sustained, and judgment for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F. 434, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dallinger-v-rapallo-mad-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack