Dallin v. Dallin

250 A.D.2d 847, 672 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5997
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 26, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 250 A.D.2d 847 (Dallin v. Dallin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dallin v. Dallin, 250 A.D.2d 847, 672 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.), entered April 15, 1997, which denied his objections to so much of an order of the same court (Mrsich, H.E.), entered February 10, 1997, as denied his application (a) for child support from the mother for support of the parties’ daughter residing with him and (b) for downward modification of his child support obligation for his son Matthew who resides with [848]*848the mother, and (2) an order of the same court, entered April 21, 1997, which sustained the mother’s objections to the order entered February 10, 1997, terminating his obligation to pay maintenance as of January 1, 1993, and directed him to pay $3,800 per month in maintenance to her, effective January 1, 1993.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Family Court properly rejected the father’s claims that his financial situation, prolonged unemployment, and illnesses warranted a drastic reduction of his maintenance and child support obligations. The father has failed to produce any competent evidence to support his claim that he used his best efforts to obtain employment commensurate with his qualifications and experience (see, Matter of Heverin v Sackel, 239 AD2d 418; Matter of Yepes v Fichera, 230 AD2d 803) or that his medical conditions rendered him unemployable (see, Matter of Reed v Reed, 240 AD2d 951).

Further, under the circumstances of this case, the father is not entitled to child support from the mother on the ground that one of the parties’ children has relocated to his residence (see, Tuchrello v Tuchrello, 204 AD2d 1020).' O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Todd M. v. Cynthia O.
215 A.D.3d 1106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Weinschneider v. Weinschneider
88 A.D.3d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
J.S. v. J.S.
19 Misc. 3d 634 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Matter of Mark Snyder v. Snyder
2004 NY Slip Op 50019 (Monroe Family Court, 2004)
Curran v. Curran
2 A.D.3d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Beard v. Beard
300 A.D.2d 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Mitgang v. Mitgang
284 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Kefeli v. Kefeli
270 A.D.2d 490 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Burke v. Burke
265 A.D.2d 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Rosen v. Rosen
260 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 A.D.2d 847, 672 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dallin-v-dallin-nyappdiv-1998.