Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of Dallas v. Willacy County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 1
This text of 162 S.W.2d 149 (Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of Dallas v. Willacy County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Article 7880 — 109, Vernon’s Ann. Civ.Stats., in part provides that: “Suits for delinquent water assessments may be brought either in the county in which the irrigation district is situated or in the county in which the defendant resides.”
*150 Appellant asserts that because of the provisions of Article 3, § 35, of the Texas Constitution, Vernon’s Ann. St., the provision above quoted is inoperative.
We overrule this contention. Hidalgo and Cameron Counties Water Control and Improvement District No. 9 v. American Rio Grande Land & Irrigation 'Co., 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 509.
As the main office and principal place of business of appellee district is now and was at the time of the filing of this suit located in Hidalgo County, Texas, appel-lee’s suit for collection of flat rate water assessments, made in conformity with the provisions of Article 7880 — 109, may be maintained in said county.
The trial court properly overruled appellant’s plea of privilege and its judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 S.W.2d 149, 1942 Tex. App. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dallas-joint-stock-land-bank-of-dallas-v-willacy-county-water-control-texapp-1942.