Dallas County v. Huidekoper; Same v. Davol

154 U.S. 655, 14 S. Ct. 1200, 25 L. Ed. 974, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1548
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 5, 1880·No. 224 and 226·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr; Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

These are suits in equity to enjoin the collection of judgments against Dallas County on coupons for interest attached to the same class of bonds just considered in Dallas County v. Huidekoper, No. 225, ante, 654, and relief.' is asked on the ground that the charter of the railroad company had expired before any organization was effected under it, and that this fact was not known to the county until after the judgment was rendered. After what has been said in the other case, it is clear that the bills were properly dismissed without considering the power of a court of- equity to sustain such a suit, and the decree in each of the cases is consequently Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dallas County v. Huidekoper; Same v. Davol, 154 U.S. 655, 14 S. Ct. 1200, 25 L. Ed. 974, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1548 (1880).

154 U.S. 655 (Dallas County v. Huidekoper; Same v. Davol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Last Chance Mining Co. v. United States
12 Cl. Ct. 551 (Court of Claims, 1987)
Kardo Co. v. Adams
231 F. 950 (Sixth Circuit, 1916)