Dallas Consol. Electric St. Ry. Co. v. Garrison

Fifth Circuit

Dallas Consol. Electric St. Ry. Co. v. Garrison

199 F. 987, 117 C.C.A. 663, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1784

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 27, 1912·No. No. 2,308·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A majority of the judges find no reversible error in the rulings on the pleadings and in regard to the admission of evidence. The plea of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff was properly submitted to the jury, and we find no error in the instructions of the court. [988]*988Whether the damages allowed by the jury were excessive is beyond our province. Erie Railroad Co. v. Winter, 143 U. S. 60-75, 12 Sup. Ct. 356, 36 L. Ed. 71. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A majority of the judges find no reversible error in the rulings on the pleadings and in regard to the admission of evidence. The plea of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff was properly submitted to the jury, and we find no error in the instructions of the court. [988]*988Whether the damages allowed by the jury were excessive is beyond our province. Erie Railroad Co. v. Winter, 143 U. S. 60-75, 12 Sup. Ct. 356, 36 L. Ed. 71. Judgment affirmed.

Dallas Consol. Electric St. Ry. Co. v. Garrison, 199 F. 987, 117 C.C.A. 663, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1784 (5th Cir. 1912).

Pincite

199 F. 987 (Dallas Consol. Electric St. Ry. Co. v. Garrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related