Daliz v. T.R. Hughes, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Daliz v. T.R. Hughes, Inc.

411 S.W.3d 871, 2013 WL 5744466, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1238

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 2013·No. No. ED 99448·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rosa Daliz appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her First Amended Petition with prejudice. The trial court concluded that it was barred by the five year statute of limitations set forth in Section 516.120 RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose [872] would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rosa Daliz appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her First Amended Petition with prejudice. The trial court concluded that it was barred by the five year statute of limitations set forth in Section 516.120 RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose [872] would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Daliz v. T.R. Hughes, Inc., 411 S.W.3d 871, 2013 WL 5744466, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1238 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

411 S.W.3d 871 (Daliz v. T.R. Hughes, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.