Dalio v. Brainin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dalio v. Brainin

37 A.D.2d 972, 327 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 972 (Dalio v. Brainin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dalio v. Brainin, 37 A.D.2d 972, 327 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant Abramoff, as limited by his brief, from so much of (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 15, 1970, as is in favor of plaintiffs against him, (2) an order of said court dated February 3,1971, as granted only in part his motion to resettle the judgment and (3) a resettled .judgment of said court, entered February 8, 1971, as is in favor of plaintiffs against him; and cross appeal by plaintiffs from the order dated February 3, 1971. Appeal from the judgment entered December 15, 1970 dismissed as academic. That judgment was superseded by the resettled judgment. Order dated February 3, 1971 and resettled judgment entered February 8, 1971 affirmed insofar as appealed from by defendant Abramoff. Cross appeal by plaintiffs dismissed. Plaintiffs have abandoned their appeal. Plaintiffs are awarded one 'bill of costs against defendant Abramoff, to cover all the appeals. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant Abramoff, as limited by his brief, from so much of (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 15, 1970, as is in favor of plaintiffs against him, (2) an order of said court dated February 3,1971, as granted only in part his motion to resettle the judgment and (3) a resettled .judgment of said court, entered February 8, 1971, as is in favor of plaintiffs against him; and cross appeal by plaintiffs from the order dated February 3, 1971. Appeal from the judgment entered December 15, 1970 dismissed as academic. That judgment was superseded by the resettled judgment. Order dated February 3, 1971 and resettled judgment entered February 8, 1971 affirmed insofar as appealed from by defendant Abramoff. Cross appeal by plaintiffs dismissed. Plaintiffs have abandoned their appeal. Plaintiffs are awarded one 'bill of costs against defendant Abramoff, to cover all the appeals. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 972, 327 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalio-v-brainin-nyappdiv-1971.