Daley v. State

710 So. 2d 757, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5933, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1298
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 760 So. 2d 217
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 27, 1998·No. No. 98-1105·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Donovan Daley appeals the order denying his post-conviction motion seeking a belated appeal. We affirm because the relief is available only through a petition for writ of habe-as corpus filed in this court. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j) (1997).

However, for the sake of judicial economy, we treat this case as if Daley had filed his request for a belated appeal in this court. Because the request was made more than five years after Daley’s conviction and sentence became final, relief is presumptively barred by laches. Wing v. State, 704 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); McCray v. State, 699 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1997). Daley cannot overcome that presumption by filing a sworn statement that his trial attorney actively misled him about the status of the appeal, since he

alleged in his sworn post-conviction motion that his attorney truthfully advised him that no appeal had been filed. Accordingly, we summarily deny relief.

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daley v. State, 710 So. 2d 757, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5933, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1298 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

710 So. 2d 757 (Daley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCray v. State
699 So. 2d 1366 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Wing v. State
704 So. 2d 1154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)