Daley v. Cunningham

60 Cal. 530, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 502
California Supreme Court·Decided May 30, 1882·No. No. 7,000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The Court:

We do not think there was any misjoinder of parties plaintiff in this canse (C. C. P., 382), and are of the opinion that the demurrer on that ground was properly overruled.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment and order are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daley v. Cunningham, 60 Cal. 530, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 502 (Cal. 1882).

60 Cal. 530 (Daley v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Southern Pacific Co.
180 P. 20 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Bassot v. United Railroads
177 P. 884 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)