Daley v. Cunningham
60 Cal. 530, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 502
This text of 60 Cal. 530 (Daley v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Daley v. Cunningham, 60 Cal. 530, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 502 (Cal. 1882).
Opinion
We do not think there was any misjoinder of parties plaintiff in this canse (C. C. P., 382), and are of the opinion that the demurrer on that ground was properly overruled.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment and order are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hall v. Southern Pacific Co.
180 P. 20 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Bassot v. United Railroads
177 P. 884 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 Cal. 530, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daley-v-cunningham-cal-1882.