Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.

994 A.2d 1079, 606 Pa. 43, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1029
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 11, 2010·No. No. 410 EAL 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of May 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Did the Superior Court err by permitting suits for more than one malignant disease resulting from the same asbestos exposure under the “two-disease” rule?

This case is consolidated for oral argument with No. 415 EAL 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc., 994 A.2d 1079, 606 Pa. 43, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1029 (Pa. 2010).

994 A.2d 1079 (Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.
37 A.3d 1175 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)