D'Alessandro v. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

D'Alessandro v. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Co.

264 A.D. 867, 36 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5168

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 1942·Published

Opinion

Action to recover damages for breach of an alleged oral contract of employment. Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for breach of an alleged oral contract of employment. Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

D'Alessandro v. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Co., 264 A.D. 867, 36 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5168 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

264 A.D. 867 (D'Alessandro v. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.