D'Alessandro v. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

D'Alessandro v. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Co.

264 A.D. 867, 36 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5168

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 867 (D'Alessandro v. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D'Alessandro v. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Co., 264 A.D. 867, 36 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5168 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for breach of an alleged oral contract of employment. Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for breach of an alleged oral contract of employment. Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 867, 36 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalessandro-v-rubsam-horrmann-brewing-co-nyappdiv-1942.