Daleo v. Travelers Indemnity Company
This text of 282 So. 2d 169 (Daleo v. Travelers Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
George DALEO and John Dubois, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents,
v.
The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Alan R. Schwartz and Horton, Schwartz & Perse and Sams, Anderson, Alper, Spencer *170 & Post, Miami, for petitioners, cross-respondents.
David L. Willing of Adams, George & Wood and Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for respondent, cross-petitioner.
PER CURIAM:
Petitioners' petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Petitioners-Cross Respondents' petition for attorney's fees is denied and Respondent's cross petition for writ of certiorari is granted without oral argument. The filing of briefs is hereby dispensed with, certiorari is granted, the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, is quashed, and the cause remanded for reconsideration in light of Wilder v. Wright, 278 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1973).
CARLTON, C.J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 So. 2d 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daleo-v-travelers-indemnity-company-fla-1973.