Dalenko v. News & Observer Publishing Co.

528 F. App'x 375
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2013·No. No. 13-1075·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carol Dalenko appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reopen and to amend her complaint and the order denying her motions for findings and to amend and to vacate. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dalenko v. News & Observer Publ’g Co., No. 5:10-cv-00184-H (E.D.N.C. June 13, 2012; Jan. 15, 2013). We grant the motion to replace the informal reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dalenko v. News & Observer Publishing Co., 528 F. App'x 375 (4th Cir. 2013).

528 F. App'x 375 (Dalenko v. News & Observer Publishing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.