Dale Walker and Florence Walker v. K-3 Resources, L.P., A/K/A and D/B/A K-3 Bmi, A/K/A and D/B/A K-3 Services, A/K/A and D/B/A Biosolids Management Management by Ke3, L.P., K-3 Resources, Inc. Services by Ke, L.L.C. Karlis Ercums, III And Johnny Lee King, Jr.
This text of Dale Walker and Florence Walker v. K-3 Resources, L.P., A/K/A and D/B/A K-3 Bmi, A/K/A and D/B/A K-3 Services, A/K/A and D/B/A Biosolids Management Management by Ke3, L.P., K-3 Resources, Inc. Services by Ke, L.L.C. Karlis Ercums, III And Johnny Lee King, Jr. (Dale Walker and Florence Walker v. K-3 Resources, L.P., A/K/A and D/B/A K-3 Bmi, A/K/A and D/B/A K-3 Services, A/K/A and D/B/A Biosolids Management Management by Ke3, L.P., K-3 Resources, Inc. Services by Ke, L.L.C. Karlis Ercums, III And Johnny Lee King, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-08-00266-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________
DALE WALKER AND FLORENCE WALKER, Appellants,
v.
K-3 RESOURCES, L.P., A/K/A AND D/B/A K-3 BMI, A/K/A AND D/B/A K-3 SERVICES, A/K/A AND D/B/A BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT BY KE3, L.P. K-3 RESOURCES, INC.; SERVICES BY KE, L.L.C.; KARLIS ERCUMS, III; AND JOHNNY LEE KING, JR., Appellee. _____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellants, Dale Walker and Florence Walker, perfected an appeal from a judgment
entered by the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas, in cause number 06-550-D.
Appellants have filed an agreed motion to dismiss appeal on grounds that the parties have
reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellants request that
this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ agreed motion
to dismiss appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX . R. APP.
P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ agreed motion to dismiss appeal is granted, and the appeal is
hereby DISMISSED. The parties have agreed, as part of the settlement, to bear their own
costs incurred in this appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no
motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 23rd day of October, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dale Walker and Florence Walker v. K-3 Resources, L.P., A/K/A and D/B/A K-3 Bmi, A/K/A and D/B/A K-3 Services, A/K/A and D/B/A Biosolids Management Management by Ke3, L.P., K-3 Resources, Inc. Services by Ke, L.L.C. Karlis Ercums, III And Johnny Lee King, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dale-walker-and-florence-walker-v-k-3-resources-lp-aka-and-dba-k-3-texapp-2008.