Dale v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dale v. Safir

283 A.D.2d 248, 728 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5081

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 283 A.D.2d 248 (Dale v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dale v. Safir, 283 A.D.2d 248, 728 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered June 26, 2000, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Police Commissioner’s denial of petitioner’s application for a premises pistol license with target endorsement, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We hold that there is a rational relationship between petitioner’s 1993 acts of public lewdness at the age of 31, resulting in two arrests, a conviction and an order of protection, and the “good moral character” required by Penal Law § 400.00 (1) (b) for issuance of the target pistol license that petitioner seeks (cf., Matter of Hines v Kelly, 222 AD2d 277, lv denied 87 NY2d 810). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Ellerin, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered June 26, 2000, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Police Commissioner’s denial of petitioner’s application for a premises pistol license with target endorsement, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We hold that there is a rational relationship between petitioner’s 1993 acts of public lewdness at the age of 31, resulting in two arrests, a conviction and an order of protection, and the “good moral character” required by Penal Law § 400.00 (1) (b) for issuance of the target pistol license that petitioner seeks (cf., Matter of Hines v Kelly, 222 AD2d 277, lv denied 87 NY2d 810). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Ellerin, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 248, 728 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dale-v-safir-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack