Dale v. Landrum Temporary Services Inc.

458 So. 2d 32, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2197, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16478
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 16, 1984
DocketNos. AY-278, AY-280 and AY-279
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 32 (Dale v. Landrum Temporary Services Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dale v. Landrum Temporary Services Inc., 458 So. 2d 32, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2197, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16478 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal orders of the deputy denying their requests for a partial advance upon compensation benefits in order that they might pay their attorney’s fees. In Travelers Insurance Company v. Taylor, 444 So.2d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), this court recently held that a partial advance for the purpose of paying claimant’s attorney’s fees is materially prejudicial to the carrier and must be denied. We decline to recede from our opinion in Taylor. However, we join in the sentiments of another panel of this court that this matter should be given further study by the Division of Workers’ Compensation and the Florida Legislature, since the present legislative scheme seriously impacts upon injured claimants’ ability to secure the services of competent attorneys in cases in which the absence of such assistance is tantamount to a forfeiture of benefits conferred by law. Aramburo v. Cargo Development, Inc., 455 So.2d 567 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keister v. Keister
458 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 So. 2d 32, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2197, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dale-v-landrum-temporary-services-inc-fladistctapp-1984.