Dale v. Hill
This text of 212 F.2d 480 (Dale v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellees obtained a judgment against the appellants for the possession of a certain business lot in the Town of Fairbanks, and for rentals claimed to be due 13 Alaska 690. The sole specifications of error made on the appeal from the judgment are that the court erred in sustaining objections to the introduction of allegedly competent, relevant and material evidence offered by the appellants, and that it erred in overruling appellants’ objections to the introduction of allegedly incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial evidence produced on behalf of the appellees. We have examined the record, and find that no error of a prejudicial character was committed in the respects indicated.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 F.2d 480, 15 Alaska 14, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dale-v-hill-ca9-1954.