Dale v. Fleming
This text of 7 Ky. Op. 74 (Dale v. Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The parties voluntarily substituted the court for a jury in the trial of this action. There is no equitable issue involved, and the transfer of the cause to the equity side of the docket was in effect submitting the law and facts to the court.
We perceive no reversible error in the court’s finding. Dale’s charge for feeding Fleming’s stock is so outrageous as to throw a shade of suspicion upon his whole account, and hence he can not complain that the court required strict proof before allowing any of it. We are also of opinion that there was no palpable wrong done to Fleming.
The denials in Fleming’s answer are certainly as specific as the allegations of the petition. Neither pleading would have been held good upon demurrer, but they were treated as good by the parties.
Judgment on both the appeal and cross-appeal affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Ky. Op. 74, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dale-v-fleming-kyctapp-1873.