Dale v. Dumpson

New York Court of Appeals

Dale v. Dumpson

346 N.E.2d 818, 38 N.Y.2d 920, 382 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2362

DecidedFebruary 26, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 346 N.E.2d 818 (Dale v. Dumpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dale v. Dumpson, 346 N.E.2d 818, 38 N.Y.2d 920, 382 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2362 (N.Y. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, with directions to dismiss the proceeding for mootness. The issue presented as to the failure to provide appropriate long-term cáre to the adjudicated neglected child has become moot in view of the uncontradicted written communication to this court that the commissioner has provided such care.

Concur: Chief Judge Bkeitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, with directions to dismiss the proceeding for mootness. The issue presented as to the failure to provide appropriate long-term cáre to the adjudicated neglected child has become moot in view of the uncontradicted written communication to this court that the commissioner has provided such care.

Concur: Chief Judge Bkeitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

346 N.E.2d 818, 38 N.Y.2d 920, 382 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dale-v-dumpson-ny-1976.