Dale Sue Jones and Stanley Ray Jones v. Ted Scott, M.D.
This text of Dale Sue Jones and Stanley Ray Jones v. Ted Scott, M.D. (Dale Sue Jones and Stanley Ray Jones v. Ted Scott, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
Appellants Dale Sue Jones and Stanley Ray Jones perfected this appeal to challenge the trial court's judgment dismissing their health care liability claim against appellees Ted Scott, et al. By order dated December 3, 2004, this appeal was abated pursuant to a notice of bankruptcy by the Joneses. Pending before this Court is Dr. Scott's motion to reinstate the appeal. Attached to the motion is a certified copy of an order of dismissal with prejudice from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. Pursuant to Rule 8.3(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion and reinstate the appeal.
The clerk's record and reporter's record have both been filed. Following notice of bankruptcy and our order of abatement, all appellate timetables were suspended. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Per the briefing schedule provided in Rule 38.6, the Joneses' brief is due to be filed on or before February 28, 2005. Doctor Scott's brief will be due thirty days after the Joneses' brief is filed.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dale Sue Jones and Stanley Ray Jones v. Ted Scott, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dale-sue-jones-and-stanley-ray-jones-v-ted-scott-m-texapp-2005.