Dale E. Manthey v. Carolyn Sabol,Warden

80 F. App'x 538
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 10, 2003·No. 03-2893·Unpublished·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Dale Manthey (Manthey) filed a complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), claiming Warden Carolyn Sabol violated his constitutional rights when she failed to authorize his transfer from one federal prison camp to another in accordance with Bureau of Prisons policies. The district court 1 dismissed without prejudice the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and Manthey appeals. Upon de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Manthey failed to allege the violation of a constitutional right, see Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 247, 103 S.Ct. 1741, 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (inmate has no specific constitutional right to be housed in any particular institution).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Batley, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dale E. Manthey v. Carolyn Sabol,Warden, 80 F. App'x 538 (8th Cir. 2003).

80 F. App'x 538 (Dale E. Manthey v. Carolyn Sabol,Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Auton v. Straughn
E.D. Arkansas, 2024
Boals v. Budnik
E.D. Arkansas, 2024
Spencer v. Payne
E.D. Arkansas, 2024
Youngberg v. Long
E.D. Arkansas, 2023
Hill v. Greene County
E.D. Arkansas, 2022