Dale E. Manthey v. Carolyn Sabol,Warden
This text of 80 F. App'x 538 (Dale E. Manthey v. Carolyn Sabol,Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Federal inmate Dale Manthey (Manthey) filed a complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), claiming Warden Carolyn Sabol violated his constitutional rights when she failed to authorize his transfer from one federal prison camp to another in accordance with Bureau of Prisons policies. The district court 1 dismissed without prejudice the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and Manthey appeals. Upon de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Manthey failed to allege the violation of a constitutional right, see Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 247, 103 S.Ct. 1741, 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) (inmate has no specific constitutional right to be housed in any particular institution).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard H. Batley, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 F. App'x 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dale-e-manthey-v-carolyn-sabolwarden-ca8-2003.