D'Alauro v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

357 So. 2d 260, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15667
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1978·No. No. 77-586·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals a final judgment on a jury verdict. The single point presented urges error upon the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The weight of the evidence and a claimed prejudicial comment of defendant’s counsel are [261] urged as grounds for a new trial. We hold that the record supports the verdict and that the claimed prejudicial comment concerning workman’s compensation was in response to statements by plaintiff’s attorney. The judgment is affirmed. See Ward v. Hopkins, 81 So.2d 493 (Fla.1955); and Pix Shoes of Miami, Inc. v. Howarth, 201 So.2d 80 (Fla.3d DCA 1967). See also Murray v. State, 154 Fla. 688, 18 So.2d 782 (1944); and Tyson v. State, 87 Fla. 392, 100 So. 254 (1924).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Alauro v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 357 So. 2d 260, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15667 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

357 So. 2d 260 (D'Alauro v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pix Shoes of Miami, Inc. v. Howarth
201 So. 2d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Ward v. Hopkins
81 So. 2d 493 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Murray v. State
18 So. 2d 782 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)
Sparkman v. State Prison Custodian
18 So. 2d 772 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)
Tyson v. State
100 So. 254 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)